Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(110)
-
▼
March
(25)
- Enter Round 2 Match 1 scores
- Enter Round 2 Match 1 lineups
- Enter Round 1 Match 2 scores
- Enter Round 1 Match 2 lineups
- PJ Carlissimo has no regrets trading Lillard's pic...
- Enter Round 1 Match 1 Playoff scores
- Enter Line up for Round 1 Game 1 Playoffs & NIT co...
- Proposed Fantasy League Pay Outs
- Fantasy Finals History & Standings
- Enter Match 40 scores
- Enter Match 40 lineups
- Enter Match 39 scores
- After the Mile
- Enter Match 39 lineups
- Enter Match 38 scores
- Enter Match 38 lineups
- Reason for Ticket's alternate bike ride route home...
- Enter Match 37 scores
- Enter Match 37 lineups
- http://games.espn.go.com/fba/playerrater
- 9th Supplemental draft
- Enter Match 36 scores
- Enter Match 36 lineups (March 8 start)
- Enter Match 35 scores
- Enter Match 35 lineup
-
▼
March
(25)
16 comments:
P4-Mr.B...Invaders-Nitecaps...Ticket-Swat...Wingos-ETeam
Hey Mark,
Can we get the schedule for all the remaining games?
This is getting juicy!
Match 36 P4-Ticket...Invaders-Wingos...Mr.B-Swat...Mitecaps-ETeam...Match 37 P4-ETeam...Ticket-Nitecaps...Invaders-Swat...Wingos-Mr.B...Match 38 ETeam-Swat...Mr.B-Nitecaps...Ticket-Wingos...P4-Invader...Match 39 P4-Swat...Ticket-Invaders...Wingos-Nitecaps...Mr.B-ETeam...Match 40 P4-Wingos...Invaders-ETeam...Swat-Nitecaps...Ticket-Mr.B
E Team says:
Trying to slow the league's hottest team...
DHow, Monta, Pierce, Duncan, Greivis, Kemba
Invaders transfer Ticket lineup from match 36 post(which I shouldn't have put up early) Monroe/Noah/Josh/Derozan/Curry/Paul
Nitecaps vs. Invaders
(1) B. Jennings
(2) Kobe
(3) E. Turner
(4) K. Farried
(5) L. Sanders
(6) C. Anthony
vs.Nitecaps Invaders play LaMarcus/Vucevic/Parsons/JR/Westbrook and BLopez
Evans/Wade/Gay/Griffin/DLee and DWest is the B's lineup-Invaders blew it by putting Match 36 heading up early so people are confused
Re: Match 35
Where in the decision to go with the "second chance" for DNP's does it say that if the team only plays one game in the match period that the "second chance" is null and void?!
Feels like we are in another instance of "making it up as we go".
Wouldn't logic dictate that the next score in the next match period would count, and then the next score in the new match period counts for the new match period?
Seems like this a rule discrepancy that needs to not be arbitrarily decided upon by an individual member of the league, but should be brought to league vote as an on going "debugging" of a new league rule.
Swat goes for Match 36 (for now):
Parker
Lawson
Lebron
Gasol
TyChandler
Conley
For Match 36, Swat makes revision:
Thought Ty Chan was a 4-5, but he is only a 5 per ESPN, so I will go for Match 36:
Parker
Lawson
Lebron
Amare
Gasol
Conley
Sean there's no discrepancy and no one person(Invaders?)makes this decision.This was a point that we debated and we came up w/2nd chance only in the same match periods.When people brought up that it was not equitable for teams with players playing only once in the period I proposed looking backward one match but it didn't get support.If you go back to the old posts you'll see the discussion of this.We aren't making this up as we go along one 2nd chance within the same match period is what we voted on.As I recall it took us a long time to get you to confirm your vote delaying for 2 matches implementation of the new rule.
And Sean without detailed further Invader input concerning any individual player I strongly suggest that you have to check the injury status of your players more often.You're heading for the same problem again it seems.
Also, add that there is not a "third" chance. Even if one presents itself in the same match period.
Just to clarify.
Ticket says
Devil's advocate (who me?): You use a next match score to make up for a DNP. Two problems. If same player again plays in only one match then you have a roll over effect that makes it murky for your opponent to understand a discrepancy in score keeping for later matches. Also, this is a double edged sword if the possibility of a match lost with the next match score affects the outcome of the current match after the DNP takes place. Say your down 50+, do you want to chance your second chance score ruining a back to back night player's contribution to the following match?
Ticket says
Invaders reminded me that Swat's delay in voting cost Mr. B a second chance that would have defeated Ticket. So if Swat wants another try with Parker counting this match with a score from the match 36 period this week end, Ticket may agree to that under the "good sport under the old mutually agreed upon b match opponents' late lineup entry loophole." Here's the catch: Swat would have to agree that his lethargy cost Mr. B a victory over Ticket earlier this season and a correction in the standings would take place.
Post a Comment